A gap records evidence that is missing, unavailable, unsafe, conflicting or deliberately excluded. It does not make a claim false. An award is not a payment, delivery or impact result, and those stages must never be silently filled in.
If an aggregate would need suppression, its value is omitted and a reviewed coverage gap records only that an omission happened. Its fixed wording cannot repeat the amount or sensitive context, and it cannot point back to the source.
Every financial fact receives a disclosure review. Every derived financial fact and numeric comparison receives a fresh result review. If an input is people-derived, the result stays people-derived and needs its own reviewed-safe smallest cell. Staff costs, remuneration bands and trustee remuneration are always treated as people-derived. The final privacy review follows disclosure, so it also checks the disclosure reviewer's public limitations text.
Only human-reviewed, logically incompatible records or statements about the same exact organisation identifier, period, scope key and definition, and metric key and definition may be labelled inconsistent. Two money records must also match basis, measurement stage and amount date. Differences in voice, timing or method stay visible as differences.
No honesty, trust, faith or impact leaderboard is produced from this evidence.